[Goal Line D]

Still should've drafted Bowels IMO.

:lol: :lol: :D

[cyofish]

lostnmexico, on 05 November 2009 - 11:35 PM, said:

I did not call him a bust. I called him a potential bust and that is a real possibility based on what he has shown so far. Pollard would have been great for us as well then we could have played Coleman in the slot at Nickle.

Bad non-move TD! Apathy sux!

Well by your standards every rookie is a potential bust. Article says the improvement on defense is the result of the front 7 not Pollard. You also have to look at it as "...is Pollard that GOOD or was who he replaced that BAD?" Considering the Chiefs had cut him, I would think it's the latter.

Also, there are 29 other GMs didn't make the move. DeCoud and Coleman are both playing well so it's no sweat off the back. Pollard wouldn't have improved our team.

[dmite]

Just like Decoud was a bust last year...

[lil_charles01]

taylor228193, on 05 November 2009 - 11:31 PM, said:

he's on injured reserve... plus, it doesn't help that he's a rookie and playing at a spot with strong competition. not sure how you could call him a bust yet.

Not to call him a bust but, anytime you get a season ending injury your first year, that's not good. Not only is he missing some development, but we are going to build up our secondary in the off season and it's going to be alot of competition. So I worry he want see as many snaps with the first team which is going to lead to him being a back up and eventually getting cut. Then you guys will be calling him a bust.

[Mt. P.Falcon]

you and your thread are definite busts!